Is Perfectionism Really Worth It?
Psych 🧠- 397/500
Hey Reader,
This article provides an overview of perfectionism, its association with maladjustment, and related theoretical and treatment considerations.
What is it?
It highlights the evolution of perfectionism research, emphasizing the shift from unidimensional to multidimensional models and the importance of distinguishing between perfectionistic standards and their attainment.
Key Arguments:
Perfectionism is a multifaceted construct: It involves not only high standards but also doubts, concerns about mistakes, organization, perceived parental pressure, and social presentation concerns.
Perfectionism can be both adaptive and maladaptive: While some forms of perfectionism (e.g., striving for excellence, high personal standards) can be associated with achievement and positive outcomes, other forms (e.g., excessive concern over mistakes, socially prescribed perfectionism) can lead to significant distress, anxiety, depression, and even suicidal tendencies.
Distinguishing perfectionism from its consequences is crucial:
Discrepancy is a key driver of distress but should not be conflated with perfectionism itself.Perfectionism is not simply conscientiousness: While related, perfectionism represents a more extreme and potentially maladaptive form of striving compared to general conscientiousness.
Support this newsletter by buying the psychology handbook!👇
This Handbook explains 150+ biases & fallacies in simple language with emojis.
Or the Amazon Kindle copy from here.
What do I need to know:
Perfectionism is more than just "wanting to be perfect": It's a complex personality trait with multiple dimensions and varying manifestations.
Not all perfectionism is bad: Some forms can be adaptive and even beneficial for achievement, but others can be maladaptive and lead to significant distress.
Focus on the process, not just the outcome: Understanding the underlying thoughts, feelings, and behaviors associated with perfectionism is crucial for effective assessment and treatment.
Source:
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-02485-001