Is Your Food Too Pretty to Eat?
Psych 🧠- 333/500
Hello reader,
I’ve been exploring a lot of books around Psychology, Mindset/Success and Work.
One of the Books I’ve started is Deep Work by Cal Newport. Given the daily life’s time constraints, I am reading it on the Shortform app that has books in super details, so you get the book’s key points at a deep level.
For a limited time, they’re offering a free trial with a 20% discount on annual subscription. Check it out!
What is it?
This research paper explores consumer reactions to products integrated with lifelike photographs, termed "photo-integrated products."
While these products are popular in the marketplace, the authors investigate the surprising finding that people may actually be less likely to consume them, especially when the product is non-durable (e.g., food, disposable items).
They propose that this avoidance stems from "magical thinking," specifically the law of similarity, which suggests people believe similar-looking things share a deeper connection.
Major findings:
Photo-integrated products embody essence: Consumers believe that these products contain the essence of the depicted entity, due to the photo's resemblance to the real thing.
Consumption as essence destruction: Consuming photo-integrated products, especially non-durable ones, is perceived as destroying the depicted entity's essence, which triggers feelings of moral discomfort.
Moral discomfort drives avoidance: This moral discomfort, stemming from perceived disrespect and impurity, leads people to consume less of photo-integrated products compared to plain, name-integrated, or photo-on-packaging products.
🤯 The Only Book You Need to Master Psychology!
The Psych Handbook has 150+ biases & fallacies explained with emojis!
Or an Amazon Kindle copy from here.
What do I need to know:
Magical thinking influences consumption: Even in modern society, people hold beliefs based on visual similarity, impacting their willingness to consume certain products.
Photo integration can backfire: Integrating photos onto consumable products can trigger moral discomfort and reduce consumption, contrary to their perceived attractiveness.
Choice of image matters: The effect is stronger for images associated with morality and weaker for less realistic images (e.g., cartoons).
Product durability is key: Photo integration works better for durable goods where the essence is preserved.
Consumption salience influences reactions: People are more positive towards photo-integrated products when they're not actively thinking about consuming them.
Source: