Hey Reader,
Letâs talk about the âReverse causationâ in todayâs Psych email.
What is it?
Reverse causation is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone assumes that the cause and effect relationship between two events is the opposite of what it actually is. In other words, they assume that the effect is causing the cause, instead of the other way around.
Here's an example of reverse causation: "I'm not sleeping well because I'm anxious."
In this example, the person assumes that their anxiety is causing their poor sleep, when in fact, it's more likely that their poor sleep is causing their anxiety. This is because lack of sleep can increase stress and anxiety levels.
With simple explanations & fun visuals of 150+ biases, The Psych Handbook makes learning psychology super easy. Buy your copy from Amazon today!
What do I need to know?
Two takeaways from the Reverse causation are:
It's important to consider the direction of causality: To avoid making the mistake of reverse causation, it's important to carefully consider the direction of causality between two events. This involves identifying which event is the cause and which is the effect. In some cases, it can be difficult to determine which is which, but it's important to make a reasonable inference based on available evidence.
Correlation does not always imply causation: Just because two events are correlated or occur together, it does not necessarily mean that one is causing the other. There may be other factors or variables that are contributing to the relationship between the two events, and it's important to consider these factors when making judgments or drawing conclusions.